Revising the language of multi-omics AI: A framework for clinically transparent cancer detection
Abstract
Cancer's clinical manifestation is preceded by a cascade of molecular disruptions across multiple biological scales, from genomic instability to metabolic dysregulation. While genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, and metabolomics have each provided valuable insights, analyses confined to a single molecular layer offer an incomplete and often misleading view of the disease. The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents a compelling opportunity to synthesize these diverse data streams. However, many AI-driven multi-omics pipelines remain black boxes, prioritizing predictive accuracy over biological transparency and clinical utility. This review critically examines the state of AI-based multi-omics integration and introduces a conceptual countermeasure: the Biology-Informed Explainable Multi-Omics Intelligence Framework (Bio-EMIF). Bio-EMIF moves beyond the typical "data in, prediction out" paradigm by embedding biological knowledge, rigorous uncertainty quantification, and multi-level explain ability as foundational design principles. The framework is structured as a translational pipeline, proceeding from quality-controlled data acquisition and biological prior encoding through multimodal representation learning and graph-based modeling, culminating in a decision-support system that provides not just a risk score, but a biological rationale for its prediction. This approach is particularly critical for early cancer detection, where subtle signals are easily overwhelmed by noise, biological heterogeneity, and technical artifacts. We argue that the field must shift its focus from accumulating more data and increasing model complexity to building systems that are biologically grounded, externally validated, and inherently interpretable for clinicians. Bio-EMIF serves as a conceptual roadmap for this essential evolution in precision oncology.
Keywords
Multi-omics Artificial intelligence Explainable AI Cancer early detection Precision oncology BioinformaticsReferences (17)
- [1] Rappoport, N., & Shamir, R. (2018). Multi-omic and multi-view clustering algorithms: Review and cancer benchmark. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(20), 10546–10562. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1226
- [2] Subramanian, I., Verma, S., Kumar, S., Jere, A., & Anamika, K. (2020). Multi-omics data integration, interpretation, and its application. Bioinformatics and Biology Insights, 14, 1177932219899051. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177932219899051
- [3] Li, L., Sun, M., Wang, J., & Wan, S. (2024). Multi-omics based artificial intelligence for cancer research. Advances in Cancer Research, 163, 303–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acr.2024.06.005
- [4] Waqas, A., Tripathi, A., Ramachandran, R. P., Stewart, P. A., & Rasool, G. (2024). Multimodal data integration for oncology in the era of deep neural networks: A review. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1408843. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1408843
- [5] Valous, N. A., Popp, F., Zörnig, I., Jäger, D., & Charoentong, P. (2024). Graph machine learning for integrated multi-omics analysis: Genetics and Genomics. British Journal of Cancer, 131(2), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02706-7
- [6] Zohari, P., & Chehreghani, M. H. (2025). Graph neural networks in multi-omics cancer research: A structured survey. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.17234
- [7] Liu, S., Li, S., & Qian, K. (2026). AI-driven cancer multi-omics: A review from the data pipeline perspective. Advanced Intelligent Discovery, e202500249. https://doi.org/10.1002/aidi.202500249
- [8] Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x
- [9] Wysocka, M., Wysocki, O., Zufferey, M., Landers, D., & Freitas, A. (2023). A systematic review of biologically-informed deep learning models for cancer: Fundamental trends for encoding and interpreting oncology data. BMC Bioinformatics, 24(1), 198. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-023-05262-8
- [10] Mao, L., Wang, H., Hu, L. S., Tran, N. L., Canoll, P. D., Swanson, K. R., & Li, J. (2024). Knowledge-informed machine learning for cancer diagnosis and prognosis: A review. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 22, 10008–10028. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2024.3515839
- [11] Hanahan, D., & others. (2022). Hallmarks of cancer: New dimensions. Cancer Discov, 12(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1059
- [12] Hoadley, K. A., Yau, C., Hinoue, T., Wolf, D. M., Lazar, A. J., Drill, E., ... & Cope, L. (2018). Cell-of-origin patterns dominate the molecular classification of 10,000 tumors from 33 types of cancer. Cell, 173(2), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.022
- [13] Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., … & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need [presentation]. Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 30, pp. 5998–6008). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/7181-attention-is-all-you-need?utm_source=chatgpt.com
- [14] Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., ... & Liang, P. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07258
- [15] Moor, M., Banerjee, O., Abad, Z. S. H., Krumholz, H. M., Leskovec, J., Topol, E. J., & Rajpurkar, P. (2023). Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature, 616(7956), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05881-4
- [16] Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletarì, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., … & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1
- [17] Kairouz, P., & McMahan, H. B. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1--2), 1–210. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000083
